.

Monday, June 3, 2019

Introduction To Development Psychology

Introduction To Development PsychologyThe following essay will Compare and argument the nurture affect approach with the behaviourist approach to understanding childrens psychological outgrowth. Taking into grade the historical development of Psychology. The essay will take into account how the two approaches differ and how the two theories were unquestionable. Pia proposes and Miller are theoretician of cognitive Development and reading souring perspectives, these theorist have had a deep feign on understanding cognitive development. Skinner and Bandura are theorist of behaviour theorist each one has a varied approach to how they see things. randomness touch on and cognitive development are of the same idea , cognitive psychology looks at each individual as processor of information, Like computers that immortalize the information given and then store it the shop and then goes on to produce the output ( Mcleod,2008). Cognitive psychologist compares the human mind to a c omputer, stating that we are fitted to retrieve and store information given to us and then alter it by using mental programs (Mcleod, 2008).The Information processing theory also contains denary and qualitative development with qualitative development happening though a new line of attach for storing information and retrieval or gathering problem- resolve rules (Miller, 2011).Expanding and being able to remember more items in the meeting memory are examples of quantitative changes. Qualitative and quantitative orders of defining information both work together to progress new ways in the processing system (Miller, 2011).Jean Piagets (2002) was as being the most influential theorist of child development his studies began by observing his own children when they were infants and how they unravelled problems that Piagets had put in front of them. Piagets later went on to study other children by using a clinical method of how children would solve and remember different things raging from rules, games to the laws of physics. From observation made, Piagets devised his cognitive developmental theory of intellectual growth. Piagets sees children as active agents in their own developments, always construct their Knowledge and altering their cognitive structure to be able to understand what goes on in the world (Shaffer, 2002). Piagets cognitive development has continued to be really popular because of its extensiveness and a worthwhile tool for thought and research. Critics may have interpreted his viewpoints to rigidly (Flanagan 1996)Further research was done by George Miller(1956) on information processing and cognitive psychology. He provided two theoretical ideas of which was chunking which is the capacity for the short term working memory. Miller (1956) stated that the short term memory could only hold Five to Nine chunks of information. The second theoretical idea was information processing by using a human computer put (Miller 1920).Behaviourism works on t he foundations of stimulus response which is behaviour caused by external stimuli. Watson (1913) states that you are born with a blank slate Tabula Rosa he claims that children have no inborn tendencies he believes how you turn out depends on your up brining and how you are treated as a child. Watson went out to demonstrate that charge and other emotions are acquired and not inborn. The demonstration of classical conditioning that Watson and Rosalie Raynor (1920) did was that of a rat to a nine month old named Albert, the reaction of Albert was positive and he encountered with the rat as he had done with the dog and rabbit previously. however the next time Little Albert went to play with the rat Watson tried to get the response of timidity from Little Albert when he touched the rat, Watson would do this by standing behind him and bang a steel rod with a forge and to see what reaction he got from Albert as the child started to associate the loud banging whilst vie with the rat, the reaction was that Little Albert did became fearful of the rat and this proved that fear is learned (Shaffer, 2002).Another example of classical condition is that of a Russian physiologist Ivan Pavlov whilst studying the saliva of dog he discovered a phenomenon that he labeled psychic reflexes. And the experiment then became called Pavlovs dogs were. The dogs were in a chamber he recognised that if he paired the meat powder with a stimulus standardised the noise of a ringing bell the dogs would react and that would produce the dogs salivation. Pavlov has shown that stimulus-response. (Learning-theories.com 2012).Burrhus Fredrick Skinner( 1904-90) theory was related to behaviour he was well known and had the most effect in his area of psychology. Operant conditioning differs from classical conditioning for the reason that children learn from their environment. Research was done by using animals and children he stated that it can be possible to shape both animals and childrens beh aviour by using reinforcement for example the naughty step or a star chart , Parents whitewash apply reinforcement by praising a child when he or she has been good or punishing them if they have missed behaved (Slater and Bremner 2003).Albert Bandura (1925) studied different behaviours in further detail. His behaviourism was less machine-like than skinners theory. He did not only concentrate on observing behaviour he also studied what processes went on in the mind. His approach at first was named sociobehaviorism, then social cognitive theory and in the end social learning theory (Slater and Bremner 2003). In the mid-sixties Bandura conducted a sequence of experiments on childrens aggression. How this was achieved was putting a small group of children in front of the TV to observe a film of an adult playing with various different toys one of which was an inflatable Bobo doll. The group watched the film and what they saw was the adult aggressively hitting the doll with a hammer. Whe n the children were left alone to play with some toys and their own Bobo doll he observed them being aggressive towards the doll mimicking what they seen on the screen. Bandura (1925) believed that children learnt from what they have observed (Slater and Bremner 2003).Bandura (1977,1986,1992) agrees with Skinner that operant conditioning is a vital form of learning more so for animals. In spite of this Bandura emphasises that humans are cognitive beings- who actively access, store and retrieve information processing (Shaffer 2002)By comparing and contrasting the two approaches, information processing and behaviourism, there are some differences in the way we learn and understand. Behaviourism, acts on stimulation, whereas cognitive and information processing uses mental processes to formulate ideas.The view of the learning process for a behaviorist is change in behavior, while a cognitivist views internal mental process including insight, information processing, memory and perceptio n. The focus of learning for behaviorists is the stimuli in external environments, whereas cognitivists have internal cognitive structuring. (Buchanan, K 1997).Behaviorism and Cognitivism are two theorys in psychology that have an effect on learning and education. Behaviorism is the study of behavior for the purpose of identifying its factors. Behaviorism employs mechanism as a fundamental metaphor, which assumes that behavior is control by a set of physical laws. Cognitivism was a reaction to Behaviorism. It is the study of mental processes through the scientific method and abstractions from behavior. Cognitivism employs mechanism and information processing as the principle metaphors for interpreting findings ( Atkisson, 2010).The theorist differs particularly in their views on behavior. The study on behaviorism was done on animals, which views behavior as a obscure consequence of environmental stimuli, whereas Cognitivism, whose research subjects are often humans, sees behavior as a point from which to abstract the mental processes behind the behavior. ( Atkisson, 2010).Cognitivism and Behaviorism are uniform in significant ways. They both use mechanism as a fundamental assumption. Cognitivism goes further than behaviorism in that it extends the mechanical assumptions to the mind, not just behavior. exactly nonetheless both theorys view human action, mental or otherwise, as determined by physical laws. ( Atkisson, 2010).In conclusion this essay has compared and contrasted the information processing approach with the behaviourist approach to understanding childrens psychological development. It has taken into account the historical development of Psychology. It has explored the theories of Piaget, Miller, Watson, Skinner, and Bandura and related the quantitative and qualitative. It is pertinent to say that although both theorist have their place the behaviourist dates back to 1913 when Watson stated that you are born with a blank slate Tabula Rosa Since t his time cognitive research has developed and shows that as well as behaviourist views remains. There is proof that even in behaviour cognitive and information processing is needed to make informed decisions about right and wrong.

No comments:

Post a Comment