Life in New England Opposed To The Chesapeake Bay In The 1600s :: American America History

Life in New England Opposed To The Chesapeake utter In The 1600sDuring the 1600s, many people in the American colonies led precise many different pop offs, some better than others. While look was sullen for some groups, other colonists were healthy and happy. Two groups that display such a difference are the colonists of New England and Chesapeake Bay. New Englanders enjoyed a much high standard of living. This high standard of New Englands was due to many factors, including a healthier environ manpowert, better family situation, and a high rate of reproduction.First, the inhabitants of the New England landing field were far healthier. Their clean water supply was a sharp air to the contaminated waters of Chesapeake Bay. Air was also fresh and clean in New England. Chesapeake Bay colonists were plagued by disease due to their unsanitary counseling of life, and New Englanders could yield ten extra years of life because of migrating in that respect in fact, on average, they lived to be nearly 70, close to the same life expectancy as today.Second, those who migrated to New England tended to come over as families, rather dissimilar to the angiotensin-converting enzyme men who flooded Chesapeake Bay. Obviously, a much more(prenominal) stable family life took root in New England. Single women in Chesapeake Bay were few and far between, and the few that were around were not single for long. It was much easier to establish families in New England, where the balance between men and women was much closer to equal. These strong families provided security and made the New England colonists live a more stable life than those who lived to the south in Chesapeake Bay.Finally, part due to the stable family life of New England, reproduction was much steadier in the north than in the Chesapeake Bay region. New Englands women married young, around 20 years of age, and had many children before their child bearing days were over. They could expect to have at least 1 0 children, with 8 of them surviving. Chesapeakes lack of families-and more importantly-lack of women kept reproduction rates from being up to par. Thus, New Englands harvest-home was steady a nd stable, whereas Chesapeake Bay suffered the effects of an extremely secondary growth rate.